githubEdit

1 Understanding the Current Service (As-Is)

Before you start the As-Is phase

Before you start, check you have:


Skills required for the As-Is Phase

Area of Expertise

Product management

Identify assumptions related to the product’s success.

Delivery management

Manage delivery risks related to timelines or dependencies.

User research

Validate assumptions through testing and research.

Service design or business analysis

Research internal processes and create prototypes for the high-level, to-be user journey.

Technology

Identify technical risks and constraints, and guide technical choices.


Criteria for success in the As-Is Phase

This phase focuses on building a shared understanding of the problem space before moving to solutions. The criteria below describe what teams should have achieved, along with examples of evidence that indicate readiness to progress.

Criteria
Evidence

Map the as-is service

End-to-end user journey maps (required)

Technical, legal, organisational, and resource constraints are identified and understood

Discovering and note down the relevant legislation in the journey map or another document.

Model the domain

A list or visual of key domain concepts (e.g. application, approval, status)

A simple service glossary or dictionary

A rough domain diagram

Understand users and challenges

User needs statements

Lightweight personas

Accessibility needs and barriers for diverse users are understood

Interview notes, observations, or summaries

Documented challenges faced by users, frontline staff and back-office teams

Analyse research data

Themed insights or findings

Problem statements or “what we learned” summaries

Prioritise next steps

Prioritised opportunities or focus areas

What to explore and not to explore next

An initial action plan, such as:

  • quick wins

  • candidate pilots

  • areas needing further discovery or feasibility work

Initial KPIs are baselined using Discovery Insights

Moving to the next phase

Discovery is complete when the team has enough shared understanding to decide what to explore next. Before moving into the to-be stage, teams should take a moment to reflect on what they have learned and agree:

  • which problems or opportunities are most important to explore next

  • which parts of the service are understood enough to move into end-to-end journey exploration

  • where confidence is lower and further discovery, research, or testing is needed

If the criteria above have been met and supporting evidence is in place, teams can make an informed decision to:

  • proceed to the to-be phase to explore solutions

  • continue Discovery to further explore options or reduce uncertainty

  • end the work if there is no viable way forward

This decision should be based on confidence and learning, not on pressure to progress.


Run an As-Is workshop

Session
Activities
Who to involve

Introduction & framing

60 minutes

Set the objectives

Recap the service

Discuss the definition of end-to-end services

Emphasise why we take a user-centred approach to build empathy

Service owner, delivery lead, policy or programme representatives, all participants

Map the As-is

3 hours

Agree service scope and boundaries. Map the current service end-to-end including online and offline steps.

Break into groups to focus on multiple journeys or divide complex journeys. Capture any known relevant legislation either as a row in the map or as another document.

Frontline staff, back-office staff, delivery team, policy representatives, user advocates or proxies

Model the domain

60 minutes

Identify key domain concepts. Clarify roles and responsibilities. Create a shared glossary or service dictionary. Surface unclear ownership and differing interpretations across teams.

Delivery team, subject matter experts, representatives from involved organisations

Understand users and challenges

30 minutes

Using the journey maps to identify actors involved create simple personas to keep in mind through the rest of the design activities

Frontline staff, back-office staff, delivery team, policy representatives, user advocates or proxies

Analyse findings

(The facilitator can do this async during a break or before the next session) 30 minutes

Cluster insights from mapping and user work. Identify themes and patterns. Draft problem statements or opportunity areas. Record risks, assumptions, and gaps in knowledge.

Delivery team, facilitator, service owner

Prioritise next steps

(This can be moved to the start of the next day) 60 minutes

Prioritise quick wins, near-term improvements, and longer-term changes. Agree what to explore next and what not to pursue yet.

Service owner, delivery lead, policy or programme representatives, technical lead if available

Last updated

Was this helpful?